e W a n d e r i n g

By Kini Cosma

When The People complained about me driving without a driver's license and insurance, I realized that the freedom to travel had joined habeas corpus and the freedom from unwarranted searches were on America's endangered rights list.

Over the last 10 years, a combination of federal legislation, court decisions and new federal regulations have greatly reduced the rights of U.S. citizens to travel internationally and domestically.

The right to go where one wishes is among the most fundamental and ancient of freedoms in the Anglo-Saxon legal tradition. Article 42 of the Magna Carta provided:

"It shall be lawful to any person, for the future, to go out of our kingdom, and to return, safely and securely, by land or by water, saving his allegiance to us, unless it be in time of war, for some short space, for the common good of the kingdom: excepting prisoners and outlaws, according to the laws of the land, and of the people of the nation at war against us, and Merchants who shall be treated as it is said above."

"The right to travel is a part of he 'liberty' of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment.

Three Human Rights in the Constitution of 1787 shows how deeply engrained in our history this freedom of movement is. Freedom of movement across frontiers in either direction, and inside frontiers as well, was a part of our heritage.

Travel may be necessary for a livelihood. It may be as close to the heart of the individual as the choice of what he eats, or wears, or reads. Freedom of movement is basic in our scheme of values. 'Our nation,' wrote Chafee, 'has thrived on the principle that, outside areas of plainly harmful conduct, every American is left to shape his own life as he thinks best, do what he pleases, go where he pleases.' (citations omitted)

The U. S. government has also breached the ancient Magna Carta principal that all citizens are free to travel abroad unless they have been convicted of a crime.

FAMILIARITY BREEDS CONTEMPT

So, we present to you compiled dossiers expressing incidents how adjudicators have flouted international law and their own guidelines. The principle aim is to reveal the most organized and efficient way possible using repression and discrimination while being criminalized.

Survival for this author has become a form of resistance to the Department of Justice (DOJ); state and federal courts and police departments because of one woman's sexual orientation. She is being governed as inferior and an economic burden.

It is always difficult to understand what motivates the DOJ and their collaborators to do such things. It remains a dilemma to know whether they specifically hate this woman and enjoy terrorizing her into submission, or whether they are ordinary people caught up in the evil of the police regime.

If they were just ordinary men and women, the question is whether, we would behave in a similar way in similar circumstances providing fear as a constant companion over a crunched up piece of paper, a merry Christmas balloon, a sea shell...that a police officer found in front of her house.

When will we recognize what is happening to the underprivileged who are being trafficked in the United States today? When will we have the courage to care?

Must we continue to break a woman down so that a woman can no longer perform useful work because she had dreams and hopes one can reasonably expect of life?

How long should we continue to beat her into submission by verbal abuse and through the use of other repressive tactics?

Is it more humane to rob her of a family at any costs and discard her on the street?

Is it more economical to continue to use psychological warfare and rule a woman "insane" or "crazy" to undermine her qualities rendering her credibility useless, instead of being held accountable to pay out damages?

Should we use verbal abuse to make the woman feel inferior hoping she will submit to the whims of strange men?

In a 1972 Landmark decision on the Death Penalty, former Chief Justice William Brennan said, "Punishment by its severity must not degrade human dignity. The calculated human killing by the state denies the executed person humanity. It does not honor the victim to emulate the murderer and to treat people like objects to be toyed with and discarded.

After one of the many ‘selections’ take place, what will our life expectancy be worth? We may as well bring back the gas chambers.

More Terror Planned For Transient Woman

A woman who was self-employed in Napa, California, as a paralegal enforcing judgments was ruled to be a "sex offender" by a Judge Ronald T.L. Young in Napa County, California. She was never entitled to an appeal. As a result, she has been disenfranchised by the Jews and the justice system. She must service American men while others bully her.

Regardless of the womans decent, respectable, court filings at every level of state and federal courts, her voice remains unheard; even now at the U.S. District Court of Northern California in San Francisco and Oakland. Regardless of priority case management, this has been going on for ten years. Her call for help does not count because she is being denied basic humanity. She is withstanding severe cruel and unusual hardships for which the U.S. Government has sanctioned termination of her life through forced suicide.

Her fears of discrimination and violence have gone heedlessly imposed upon her as inevitable and her campaigns for economic, social and legal rights for herself and her family has taken on all forms of discrimination.

This woman has been forced to live underground having to rely on men to assist her because the U.S. Government and their tyranny have failed to consider her asylum claims. Housing and other resources are so scarce that she is being forced to travel to jurisdiction to jurisdiction while facing judicial abuse and harassment.

Though she has worked very hard for no or low wages or welfare benefits, the U.S. Government will not allow her to be economically independent. She has done a mountain of caring work for nothing, but still has not been given back her $100k trust estate monies and resources needed to make choices, including sexual choices.

Her campaign against loss of child custody, police arrests, anti-lesbian violence, criminalization, as well as being forced to live an underground existence also remain heedlessly ignored.

Hatred at all levels are breaching Gender Guidelines and International Law in her asylum appeals. Her work is being unvalued and devalued, and is being unwaged and low-waged. Wealth and profit is coming from her work, yet her values of survival and welfare have been dismissed.

By robbing this transient woman of any form of human rights that includes a grand theft larceny of her $100k trust estate monies that her mother left her, she is becoming weak. By inflicting disgrace so severe and damaging, she now may not use the bathroom without having to suffer more mental abuse. This is so the U.S. Government can use severe forms of neglect to prevent her from reporting data. That way other women can come up missing as well.